FluiqFluiq
  • ObservabilityTrace every call, cost, and latency
  • SecurityBlock attacks, redact PII and secrets
  • OptimizationCache repeated prompts automatically
  • EvaluationScore responses and whole agent runs
  • DatasetsGolden sets that capture whole agent runs
  • Prompt ManagementVersion and deploy prompt templates
  • AlertsPush eval and security events to Slack

LLM Providers

  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic
  • Google Gemini
  • Google Vertex AI

Agent Frameworks

  • LangChain
  • LangGraph
  • CrewAI
  • Google ADK
  • MCP

Vector Databases

  • Pinecone
  • Chroma
  • Weaviate
  • FAISS
  • Qdrant
14 integrations · zero wrappersView all
Pricing
  • Fluiq DocsGuides, concepts & SDK reference
  • Code SamplesCopy-paste integration snippets
  • LLM Cost CalculatorCompare OpenAI, Claude & Gemini pricing
  • polygateOpen-source unified LLM client
  • InfragerCloud diagrams to secure Terraform
Contact
LoginStart free
FluiqvsBraintrust

The Braintrust Alternative: Evals Plus the Full Ops Stack

Braintrust is a strong evaluation platform. Fluiq adds production tracing, security scanning, and response caching alongside evals, all from two lines of Python, with no manual scoring scaffolding.

Get started freeRead the docs

Free tier · No credit card · 2-minute setup

Inlineevals on every production LLM call
Autotracing, no @traced decorators needed
Built-insecurity on top of evals

Feature comparison

How Fluiq and Braintrust stack up across the features that matter in production.

Feature
FluiqFluiq
Braintrust
Production LLM tracing (auto)
eval-focused, limited tracing
2-line setup, no decorators
requires @traced or manual logging
13+ framework integrations
~
Full agent span trees
Per-node token & cost tracking
~
Prompt injection & jailbreak blocking
PII detection & redaction
Trace-driven response caching
LLM-as-judge evals
Agentic evaluation (whole-run: tools, trajectory, coordination)
~agent evals without multi-model jury or DAG-aware layers
Multi-model judge jury with audit trail
Whole-trajectory dataset capture (tools, MCP, media)
~datasets are IO-centric; no pinned tool/MCP trajectories
Eval warn / block modes (inline)
Run-vs-run regression comparison on datasets
End-user feedback & team annotations
Transparent judge prompts (exact prompt & version stamped on every score)
~code scorers are inspectable; LLM-judge scores don't carry the rendered prompt
CI/CD eval gates
Dataset management
Prompt management

~ = partial support  ·  - = not available

An honest take

We'll be straight. Here's where Braintrust genuinely excels, and where Fluiq goes further.

Where Braintrust shines

  • Best-in-class evaluation UX, Braintrust's playground and scoring interface are genuinely excellent for prompt iteration.
  • Strong human-in-the-loop annotation workflows with side-by-side diff views.
  • Dataset versioning and regression testing suite are mature and well thought-out.
  • Good CI integration with the ability to gate on eval thresholds.

Where Fluiq pulls ahead

  • Production-first: Fluiq auto-instruments every LLM call at the SDK level, you get full trace trees, latency histograms, and cost attribution without writing a single logging call.
  • Inline eval modes: fluiq.eval(mode='warn') flags low-scoring responses on the trace; mode='block' intercepts them before they reach users.
  • Security included: prompt injection blocking, PII redaction, jailbreak scoring, and secret leak prevention run on every production call, not just in eval scripts.
  • Response caching: trace-driven Redis caching serves repeated prompts instantly, cutting LLM spend without any code changes.
  • Transparent judging: every score records the exact judge prompt and version behind it, and each org can edit those prompts — then diff any two dataset runs to see what regressed, and gate CI with python -m fluiq.ci.
  • Two lines replace an entire boilerplate setup, no manual span context, no custom scorers to wire up.
Migration guide

Switch from Braintrust in minutes

Remove init_logger, @traced, and manual score calls. Fluiq runs LLM-as-judge automatically on every traced response.

Before, Braintrust

import braintrust
from braintrust import traced, init_logger

logger = init_logger(project="my-project", api_key="bt_...")

@traced
def run_pipeline(query: str) -> str:
    response = openai_client.chat.completions.create(
        model="gpt-4o",
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": query}],
    )
    result = response.choices[0].message.content
    # manual scoring
    logger.log(scores={"quality": score_quality(result)})
    return result

After, Fluiq

import fluiq
fluiq.instrument(api_key="fl_...")
fluiq.eval(mode="warn")   # automatic LLM-as-judge on every call

# @trace for named agent spans (optional)
from fluiq import trace

@trace
def run_pipeline(query: str) -> str:
    response = openai_client.chat.completions.create(
        model="gpt-4o",
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": query}],
    )
    return response.choices[0].message.content

Ready to switch?

Free tier. No credit card. Full observability, security, and evals on your first LLM call.

Start free

Unlimited free traces · 1,000 evals / month · 14-day retention

FluiqFluiq

Observe, protect, optimize, evaluate.

PlatformObservabilitySecurityOptimizationEvaluationDatasetsPrompt ManagementAlerts
CompanyIntegrationsPricingDocsCost CalculatorBlogContact
Comparevs LangSmithvs Langfusevs Heliconevs Braintrustvs Portkeyvs Lakera
IntegrationsOpenAIAnthropicLangChainCrewAIPineconeView all →
Open Sourcepolygatepolygate GitHubInfragerInfrager GitHub